• Art
  • Book Reviews
  • Catechism
  • Games
  • Music
  • Special Needs
  • Technology
  • Theology

Amazing Catechists

Teaching and learning the faith together

Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Patron Saint of Amazing Catechists
    • Donations
  • Lisa Mladinich
  • Columnists
    • Browse by Topic
      • #giveaway
      • Art
      • Campus Ministry
      • Catechetics
      • Catechism
      • Catechist Training
      • Catholic Spirituality
      • Church Documents
      • Columnists
      • Culture
      • Elementary School
      • Evangelization
      • Family Life
      • Featured
      • Games
      • General
      • Grief Resources
      • High School
      • Homeschooling
      • Liturgical
      • Mary
      • Middle School
      • Music
      • New Age
      • NFP/Chastity
      • Prayer
      • RCIA & Adult Ed
      • Reader Suggestions
      • Sacraments
      • Scripture
      • Special Needs
      • Spiritual Warfare
      • Technology
      • Theology
      • Therapeutic
      • Video
      • Vocations
    • Browse by Author
      • Alex Basile
      • Alice Gunther
      • Amanda Woodiel
      • Cay Gibson
      • Christian LeBlanc
      • Christopher Smith
      • Deanna Bartalini
      • Dorian Speed
      • Elizabeth Ficocelli
      • Elizabeth Tichvon
      • Ellen Gable Hrkach
      • Faith Writer
      • Father Juan R. Velez
      • Gabe Garnica
      • Jeannie Ewing
      • Jennifer Fitz
      • Justin Combs
      • Karee Santos
      • Lisa Mladinich
      • Marc Cardaronella
      • Maria Rivera
      • Mary Ellen Barrett
      • Mary Lou Rosien
      • Maureen Smith
      • Msgr. Robert Batule
      • Msgr. Charles Pope
      • Pat Gohn
      • Peggy Clores
      • Robyn Lee
      • Rocco Fortunato
      • Sarah Reinhard
      • Steve McVey
      • Tanja Cilia
      • William O’Leary
  • Resources
    • Bible Stories
    • Book Reviews
    • Catholic Cartoons
    • Catholic Links
    • Interviews
  • Speakers
  • Contact us

Jesus on “the exception to the rule”

By Christopher Smith, OP

In today’s Gospel reading, Jesus and his disciples were “going through a field of grain on the sabbath” when the hungry disciples “began to pick the heads of grain and eat them.”  The Pharisees saw this and challenged Jesus saying that what his disciples were doing was “unlawful to do on the sabbath.”  The Pharisees’ charge was a sabbath violation, not a case of theft, because eating from a neighbor’s standing grain was, in general, an acceptable practice (see Deut 23:25).

In this post, I want to examine Jesus’ response, where he explained his disciples were not violating the law, looking at it from four different aspects: historical, lawful, prophetical, reasonableness.

Historical

First, Jesus appeals to the behavior of David (1 Sam 21:1-6) as an example from history.  Surely the Pharisees would admit that David’s behavior and that of the high priest Ahim’elech were above reproach.  In the story from 1 Samuel, David arrives at Nob and asks the priest Ahim’elech for something to eat.  The only food on hand was the “bread of the Presence,” which is “holy bread,” fit only for the high priests to consume (for more on the bread see Lev 24:5-9).  However, Ahim’elech shares this bread with David and in turn David shares it with those accompanying him.  Jesus is making this historical connection because the Pharisees will not likely admit that David or Ahim’elech, key figures from Israel’s history, made a mistake, and to recall to the Pharisees’ mind how David shared the bread with his followers.

There is a difference between the two stories that some may believe significant when making the comparison (i.e. David and his followers / Jesus and the disciples).  David actually deceives Ahim’elech into giving him the bread.  He told the priest he was on a secret mission from the king when, in fact, he was fleeing from Saul who had vowed to kill him.  In his hasty preparations to flee, David had not packed sufficient supplies.  While the lie does not come into play in the New Testament story, most commentators don’t view the difference between the two accounts as significant as the common theme of necessity.  Both David’s followers and Jesus’ disciples, in serving their masters, had grown sufficiently hungry in the course of their duties that their masters broke with the norm to feed them.

Lawful

Next Jesus weaves a lawful argument based on the requirements specified in the Book of Numbers (28:9-20).  In the Old Testament book, the prescription for the sabbath offering is described.  To me, it sounds a lot of like work:

…you shall offer a burnt offering to the LORD: two young bulls, one ram, seven male lambs a year old without blemish; also three tenths of an ephah of fine flour for a cereal offering, mixed with oil, for each bull; and two tenths of fine flour for a cereal offering, mixed with oil, for the one ram; and a tenth of fine flour mixed with oil as a cereal offering for every lamb; for a burnt offering of pleasing odor, an offering by fire to the LORD.

However, a few verses later in the text it says: “On the first day there shall be a holy convocation: you shall do no laborious work….”  The “first day” is the sabbath.  The Pharisees are chiding the disciples, not for stealing, but working (i.e. harvesting) on the sabbath.  The slaughtering of animals, a “laborious work,” is forbidden on the sabbath by everyone except the high priests.  Jesus calls the priests who worked on the sabbath, for the purpose of worship, “innocent.”  But how is that?  Isn’t there a disconnect here?  The implication is temple worship takes precedence over the sabbath.  Jesus makes the same connection; however, he takes it a step further when he says there is, “something greater than the temple here.”  If the Pharisees believe temple worship takes precedence over the sabbath, Jesus is saying there is even something greater than the temple.  It’s no wonder they believe Jesus to be a blasphemer.

Prophetical

The next way Jesus addresses the Pharisees objection is by referring to the prophet Hosea who spoke on behalf of the Lord, saying:

For I desire steadfast love and not sacrifice, the knowledge of God, rather than burnt offerings. (Hosea 6:6)

Jesus rebukes the Pharisees’ lack of understanding of the scripture by saying, “If you knew what this meant, I desire mercy, not sacrifice, you would not have condemned these innocent men.”  The implication here is that if the Pharisees truly knew the scriptures they would act accordingly (i.e. know that God desires good will towards mankind and act similarly).  Jesus refers to his disciples as “innocent men,” just like the priests who work on the sabbath were “innocent,” because both are working for something that is more significant than the sabbath.  The Pharisees were only concerned with outward projections of piety rather than the true spiritual significance of the words contained in scripture.

Reasonableness

The last part of Jesus’ rebuttal is based on reason.  Since he is the Lord of the sabbath his disciples, who are acting in union with him, had a right to do what would normally be considered objectionable to do on the sabbath.  This is an expansion, a revelation, of the idea expressed above: “something greater than the temple is here.”  Yes, there is!  The God-man is here!  The one who originally commanded what is right, good, and holy, on the sabbath is now, once again, declaring what is right, good, and holy on the sabbath.  It is not a canceling of one in lieu of the other; instead, it is a deeper dive into what is already known.

Though not part of today’s reading, the narrative in Matthew’s Gospel continues with Jesus healing a man on the sabbath and Jesus challenging the Pharisees with a predicament:

Which one of you who has a sheep that falls into a pit on the sabbath will not take hold of it and lift it out? (Mt 12:11)

Knowing that a reasonable, common sense approach to life would lead one to conclude that relieving a man’s suffering and rescuing an animal are more significant than abstaining from work on a particular day of the week, Jesus concludes with, “So it is lawful to do good on the sabbath.”  This strikes me as much as a statement of fact as it does a question to be posed to those who doubt otherwise.

Conclusion

Jesus shows in Matthew’s eighth chapter, through word and deed, that there are times when the rule needs to give way to the exception.  Jesus’ purpose was not to provide “an out” from observance of the sabbath, not at all.  In fact, in order for there to be “an exception” there must first be a “rule” (exceptio probat regulam in casibus non exceptis (“the exception confirms the rule in cases not excepted”).  Worship of the Lord on the sabbath is proper and right.  By regularly going to the synagogue to teach and by expressing his intense desire to celebrate the Passover with his disciples (cf. Luke 22:15), Jesus demonstrates a commitment to the rule (i.e. law).  However, these teachings in Matthew’s eighth chapter were designed by the Lord to give his disciples, and us, greater spiritual insight into the law’s meaning.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Read all posts by Christopher Smith, OP Filed Under: Featured, Scripture Tagged With: disciples, Gospel of Matthew, Pharisees, reflection

About Christopher Smith, OP

Mr. Christopher Smith, OP was born and raised in Northern Michigan.  After graduating high school, he joined the United States Navy and had the honor of serving his country for almost 21 years.  He retired from active duty in March 2010 and now works as a cybersecurity consultant for the Department of Defense.  Christopher, his wife, and their two children live near Baltimore, Maryland.

Christopher earned a BA degree in Philosophy and Religious Studies from Chaminade University in Honolulu, Hawaii in 2005 and a MA degree in Theology (AOC: Moral Theology) from St. Mary's Seminary and University in Baltimore, Maryland in 2010. In June 2007, he was received into the Dominican Order as a member of the Immaculate Conception Chapter of Third Order Dominicans located at the Dominican House of Studies in Washington D.C.

When he is not blogging, Christopher is involved in several ministries in his parish, including: RCIA catechist, adult formation leader, and parish council.  He also conducts workshops on a variety of theological subjects.  Some of Christopher’s favorite research topics include: apologetics, theodicy, just war theory, church/state relations, and public theology.  He also enjoys digital photography, soccer, reading, and playing on his drum set.

In addition to writing for AC, you can find Christopher on his blog Christopher's Apologies.  He also hangs out on Twitter, Facebook, Google+, and YouTube.

Comments

  1. Christian LeBlanc says

    August 10, 2012 at 9:46 pm

    Thanks for this, I haven’t read such a manageable but thorough treatment of this story. I cover it briefly in 6th grade: Jesus was drawing a distinction between the LORD’s general instruction to keep the Sabbath (day of rest); and the 39 prohibitions about the Sabbath which were unduly restrictive, and ultimately worked against the point of having a day of rest.

Follow Us!

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

What’s New?

microphoneNEED A SPEAKER FOR YOUR NEXT IN-SERVICE?

Amazing Catechists can help!

Visit our Speakers page to access our available speakers and topics. And if you don't see what you are looking for, send a comment through the website, and we will get right back to you!

Catholic CD of the month club

Sign up for our Newsletter!

Columnists

Alice Gunther

Amanda Woodiel

Cay Gibson

Christian LeBlanc

Christopher Smith

Deanna Bartalini

Dorian Speed

Elizabeth Ficocelli

Elizabeth Tichvon

Ellen Gable Hrkach

Faith Writer

Father Juan Velez

Gabriel Garnica

Jeannie Ewing

Jennifer Fitz

Karee Santos

Lisa Mladinich

Marc Cardaronella

Mary Ellen Barrett

Mary Lou Rosien

Maureen Smith

Monsignor Robert Batule

Msgr. Charles Pope

Pat Gohn

Peggy Clores

Robyn Lee

Rocco Fortunato

Sarah Reinhard

Sherine Green

Sr. Teresa Joseph fma

Steve McVey

Tanja Cilia

William O’Leary

Archives

Share Amazing Catechists at your website!

Amazing Catechists

[footer_backtotop]

Copyright © 2022 Amazing Catechists. · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.